My Perspectives

I believe USA foreign policy should be a reflection of our national character: justice, peace, respect for human life, and fair treatment of all other nations.

I share a common interest in freedom of expression, freedom of press, freedom of choice of religion or freedom from religion, pursuit of good life, and peace at home and among nations.

I am angry at injustice, oppression, and exploitation of people. We are those who work for justice, freedom and peace.

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”

The future of our civilization is at risk of global annihilation by nuclear, biological and chemical arsenals of nations. For the civilization to survive, we must eliminate the nuclear arsenals and rely on the International Court and the United Nations to resolve the conflicts.

My Perspectives

I believe our foreign policy should be a reflection of our national character: justice, peace, respect for human life, and fair treatment of all other nations.

I share a common interest in freedom of expression, freedom of the press, freedom of choice of religion or freedom from religion, the pursuit of the good life, and peace at home and among nations.

I am angry at injustice, oppression, and exploitation of people. We are those who work for justice, freedom, and peace.

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”

The future of our civilization is at risk of global annihilation by nuclear, biological and chemical arsenals of nations. For the civilization to survive, we must eliminate the nuclear arsenals and rely on the International Court and the United Nations to resolve the conflicts.

US and Russian Foreign Policies in Iran: Directions and Consequences?

 

It is a lingering thought which has bothered me for a long time since I heard about the death of my friend Oscar.  Oscar died many years ago from lung cancer. Although this story is not about Oscar, my view of Iran is tinted with my collected memories.

Oscar was a high school English teacher and a local guide to Americans stationed or worked in Iran prior to 1979.  He needed the money to supplement his meager salary from teaching in one of the Tehran high schools.  He preferred speaking English while I was attempting to learn some basics of the Iranian Language and culture.  We had traveled to several cities including Shiraz, Isfahan and coastal cities around the Caspian Sea during previous summers.  Ancient cultures have paid high prices throughout the ages, being invaded, subjugated and still have survived. My choice was limited to only one country over several years, reading many pages about culture, language, and history of Iran.

Who was Oscar the English Teacher?  Continue reading:  https://stmichaeltraveler.wordpress.com/2018/03/29/oscar-the-english-teacher/

 

 

Oscar the English Teacher

A recent article by Roger Cohen, International Herald Tribune

Published: March 15, 2009, “Iran, Jews, and pragmatism” reminds me of the pre-1979 period. The following is my close association during 1976 with one educated Iranian and his family in Tehran.

The last time I toured Iran was summer 1976. My intention was to see the country as it was, not as it was portrayed by the Western Press, or by the Shah’s regime. In contrast to the usual tourists, I had already seen the grandeur of the Iranian past in Persepolis and great mosques in Esfahan.

My teaching job allowed me to spend part of my summer vacation touring unusual places, this time was Tehran. I met Oscar (Asgher) through another American in Tehran. Oscar, a Tehrani, was a high school English teacher in one of Tehran’s schools. He wanted to practice his English and earn a few dollars, and I needed a tour guide to see Tehran.

Iranian Revolution: Rich and the Poor

Oscar was mid-forties like most Iranians had a large built, round head and big almond brown eyes. His chocolate brown hair was receding and showed signs of early baldness. He was not married and lived with his parents and one sister in a two-room house. He appeared good natured, shy and very polite.

I met his family, the father suffered from eye disease and until recently worked a small grocery store not too far from their house. The family had no medical insurance and nothing to call savings. His disability forced him to sell the store and retire. Oscar called him Agha. The entire family lived on Oscar’s monthly income of less than $40, equivalent Iranian money during 1976, from his teaching position.

Oscar’s mother had fair skin, plump, short, and a good natural smile. Her head was often covered with a scarf just over her glasses. Oscar called her Khanom. She appeared to be busy, going and coming. Oscar said his sister, Zee Nat was mentally sick. She was a second-year student at Tehran University when she started to hear voices. She was studying to become a teacher too. Zee Nat had been in a public mental hospital several times before. She appeared to be mid-thirties, very thin, visibly shy and avoiding all eye contact. The Oscar’s family was Muslim. The only evidence of any religion was portraits, a man dressed in Arabic garb, and the other the picture of a woman. Oscar told me those are Ali, a saint to all Shia Muslims, and Merriam the mother of Jesus.

Oscar’s family home was in one of the many narrow streets in a region called Pa-Menar. The region was a walking distance south of the Old Iranian Parliament (Majlis). The house was very old, 12 feet tall ceilings, heavy doors with small window panes. The yard was relatively large and it was paved with large worn out bricks. It was void of any plants except a large bush. In the center of the yard, around pond had several goldfishes. Oscar told me that the toilet was typical of the bathroom in old Tehran. It was mostly a large hole in the ground.

The house did not have a typical kitchen except a narrow covered space, no benches or cooking table, and for cooking it was furnished with only one simple kerosene gas burner. The family’s only source of water was a deep water storage cavern (cistern) below the structure. Oscar said that the water tank was filled with rain and snow water during fall, winter, and spring.

My focus this time was Tehran, the area around the great Bazaars, and Shehre’ Reye. These sections of the city were untouched by modernity; a reminder of the great disparity in the distribution of wealth among the people. These southern parts of the city were home to the majority of the people crowded into very small quarters, narrow streets. The majority of these people were deprived of the most basic essentials of life. Iranian revolution, 1979, was a consequence of the misery of these Iranian people. Iran was a bipolar society, the very rich and many very poor people. After the revolution, many of the rich left Iran for places like Los Angles, still living in multi-million dollar Mc-mansions.

Roger Cohen states: “Exile, expropriation and, in some cases, executions have left bitter feelings among the revolution’s Jewish victims, as they have among the more than two million Muslims who have fled Iran since 1979.” These are mostly the rich who left Iran carrying their wealth and money stashed outside of the country. They lost their lavish lifestyle on the back of the poor working class Iranians.

I spent most of my two months of the summer with Oscar touring Tehran and some of the villages nestled in the mountain region. I kept correspondence with Oscar for years, hoping that someday he could visit me in the United States. Oscar passed away 6 years ago from lung cancer.

Iran has greatly advanced since 1976. The pictures of the new Tehran show how this old city has changed during this short span of 30 years. The following article: Why the Islamic Republic Has Survived by Ervand Abrahamian, describes some of the changes in Iran since 1976.

Now, after so many years, I yearn to go back for another trip.

 

Trump Demands Thousands of New Nukes

Reported by: 

FP  Situation Report, The National Security Daily Brief from Foreign Policy

By Paul McLeary with Adam Rawnsley

Wednesday, October 11, 2017
How Trump sees national security. After being shown a chart showing the gradual reduction in American nuclear weapons stockpiles during a meeting this summer, President Trump demanded “what amounted to a nearly tenfold increase in the U.S. nuclear arsenal,” several national security officials tell NBC News.

How Trump sees national security. After being shown a chart showing the gradual reduction in American nuclear weapons stockpiles during a meeting this summer, President Trump demanded “what amounted to a nearly tenfold increase in the U.S. nuclear arsenal,” several national security officials tell NBC News.

“According to the officials present, Trump’s advisers, among them the Joint Chiefs of Staff and Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, were surprised. Officials briefly explained the legal and practical impediments to a nuclear buildup and how the current military posture is stronger than it was at the height of the build-up. In interviews, they told NBC News that no such expansion is planned.”

There is also the matter of several international treaties that limit the size of the U.S. nuclear stockpile. After the meeting, according to this account, Tillerson made his infamous quip that Trump was a “moron.”

Nuclear deal. Obama administration veterans are pulling out the stops to make the case against letting the Iran nuclear deal fall apart. Over at Just Security, former Obama administration National Security Council legal adviser Tess Bridgeman games out how a decertification may not necessarily spell the end of the deal — assuming Congress doesn’t use the occasion to reimpose sanctions in an attempt to renegotiate the deal.

 

 

Asgher, My Friend, the Iranian English Teacher

This article was first published in 2009.  It is based on my experience prior to 1976. The content still is very relevant to the modern Iran.  Lots of things have changed in Iran since 2009.  Now, after over 40 years, I yearn to go back for another summer in Iran.  If I could find, I wish to sit at his grave and think of all the great times I had touring his ancient city.  I still remember his face as though it was just yesterday.

“A recent article by Roger Cohen, International Herald Tribune published: March 15, 2009, “Iran, Jews, and pragmatism” reminds me of the pre-1979 period. The following is my close association during 1976 with one educated Iranian and his family in Tehran.

The last time I toured Iran was summer 1976. My intention was to see the country as it was, not as it was portrayed by the Western Press, or by the Shah’s regime. In contrast to the usual tourists, I had already seen the grandeur of the Iranian past in Persepolis and great mosques in Esfahan.

My teaching job allowed me to spend part of my summer vacation touring unusual places, this time was Tehran. I met Oscar (Asgher) through another American in Tehran. Oscar, a Tehrani, was a high school English teacher in one of Tehran’s schools. He wanted to practice his English and earn a few dollars, and I needed a tour guide to see Tehran.

Iranian Revolution: Rich and the Poor

Oscar was mid-forties and like most Iranians had a large built, round head, and big almond brown eyes. His chocolate brown hair was receding and showed signs of early baldness. He was not married and lived with his parents and one sister in a two-room house. He appeared good natured, shy and very polite.

I met his family, the father suffered from eye disease and until recently worked a small grocery store not too far from their house. The family had no medical insurance and nothing to call savings. His disability forced him to sell the store and retire. Oscar called him Agha. The entire family lived on Oscar’s monthly income of less than $40, equivalent Iranian money during 1976, from his teaching position.

Oscar’s mother had fair skin, plump, short, and a good natural smile. Her head was often covered with a scarf just over her glasses. Oscar called her Khanom. She appeared to be busy, going and coming. Oscar said his sister, Zee Nat was mentally sick. She was a second-year student at Tehran University when she started to hear voices. She was studying to become a teacher too. Zee Nat had been in public mental hospital several times before. She appeared to be mid-thirties, very thin, visibly shy and avoiding all eye contacts. The Oscar’s family was Muslim. The only evidence of any religion was portraits, a man dressed in an Arabic garb, and the other the picture of a woman. Oscar told me those are Ali, a saint to all Shia Muslims, and Merriam the mother of Jesus.

Oscar’s family home was in one of the many narrow streets in a region called Pa-Menar. The region was a walking distance south of the Old Iranian Parliament (Majlis). The house was very old, 12 feet tall ceilings, heavy doors with small window panes. The yard was relatively large and it was paved with large worn out bricks. It was void of any plants except a large bush. In the center of the yard, around pond had several goldfishes. Oscar told me that the toilet was typical of the bathroom in old Tehran. It was mostly a large hole in the ground.

The house did not have a typical kitchen except a narrow covered space, no benches or cooking table, and for cooking it was furnished with only one simple kerosene gas burner. The family’s only source of water was a deep water storage cavern (cistern) below the structure. Oscar said that the water tank was filled with rain and snow water during fall, winter, and spring.

My focus this time was Tehran, the area around the great Bazaars, and Shehre’ Reye. These sections of the city were untouched by the modernity; a reminder of the great disparity in the distribution of the wealth among the people. These southern parts of the city were home to the majority of the people crowded into very small quarters, narrow streets. Majority of these people were deprived of the most basic essentials of life. Iranian revolution, 1979, was a consequence of the misery of these Iranian people. Iran was a bipolar society, the very rich and many very poor people. After the revolution, many of the rich left Iran for places like Los Angles, still living in multi-million dollar Mc-mansions.

Roger Cohen states: “Exile, expropriation and, in some cases, executions have left bitter feelings among the revolution’s Jewish victims, as they have among the more than two million Muslims who have fled Iran since 1979.” These are mostly the rich who left Iran carrying their wealth and money stashed outside of the country. They lost their lavish lifestyle on the back of the poor working class Iranians.

I spent most of my two months of the summer with Oscar touring Tehran and some of the villages nestled in the mountain region. I kept correspondence with Oscar for years, hoping that someday he could visit me in the United States. Oscar passed away 6 years ago from lung cancer.

Iran has greatly advanced since 1976. The pictures of new Tehran show how this old city has changed during this short span of 30 years. The following article: Why the Islamic Republic Has Survived by Ervand Abrahamian, describes some of the changes in Iran since 1979. Now, after so many years, I yearn to go back for another summer in Iran.”

First published: 2009

Are We Expanding the Syrian Sectarian War Into Proxy War With Russia

 

The Iran–Iraq War was an armed conflict between the Persians and many of the Sunni Arabs nations. The war was assisted directly by the United States and some of the European countries, lasting from September 1980 to August 1988. It was the 20th century’s longest conventional war.The conflict resulted in the death of over 500,000 Iranians and injuring millions.Why are we supporting the same countries that attacked Iran during 1980?  During the conflict, Syria steadfastly stood by Iranians during the conflict. Saudi Arabia and the Persian Gulf Kingdoms have not forgotten the intransigence of Syria government supporting the Iranian government.  Are we once more siding with the Sunni Arabs against Iranians?

The Newyork Times, Anne Barnard and Karam Shoumalioct, 12, 2015, reported:  U.S. Weaponry Is Turning Syria Into Proxy War With Russia?The American-made TOW anti-tank missiles began arriving in the region in 2013, through a covert program run by the United States, Saudi Arabia, and other allies to help certain C.I.A.-vetted insurgent groups battle the Syrian government.  The weapons are delivered to the field by American allies, but the United States approves their destination. That suggests that the newly steady battlefield supply has at least tacit American approval, now that Russian air power is backing President Bashar al-Assad.

As experience indicates,  our American made equipment is being used by ISIS. This new equipment will also be used against the government of Syria, Russians, Iranians, Kurdish and forces of Iraq government.  Have we thought through this process?

Who is paying for ISIS operations? Please Target Terror Donors

This article was published by the San Diego Union-Tribune, November 17, 2015.

“Donors in Saudi Arabia constitute the most significant source of funding to Sunni terrorist groups worldwide,” then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton wrote in a secret December 2009 memo revealed by WikiLeaks hackers. Wealthy Sunnis in Qatar, Kuwait, and the United Arab Emirates are also hugely helpful, U.S. officials have long confirmed off the record.”

 

“Friday’s brutal terrorist rampage in Paris leaves France, the rest of Europe and the United States facing a huge quandary. Islamic State has explicitly said its attacks have the goal of triggering a harsh backlash so as to further inflame potential jihadists. The Western world seems inclined to give the terrorist group what it wants.

This backlash is in its early stages and is mounting rapidly. Having declared France is at war with Islamic State and launched the heaviest air attacks yet on IS areas in Syria, President François Hollande may now invoke Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, which would require the U.S. and other NATO nations to come to France’s collective defense. Across Europe, coarse nativist rhetoric has quickly ramped up, with cold fury not just toward Islamic State but, to some extent, against politicians whose policies are seen as making domestic terrorism more likely.

Yet Islamic State isn’t a nation-state, and a conventional war can’t beat IS, al-Qaeda and other like movements. They build off ideas that can’t be destroyed by bombing raids or by turning up scrutiny of Muslim communities in Europe. Those ideas start with the central notion that societies should be organized and run not by elected governments but by Islamic clerics with a radical interpretation of their faith, men for whom “death to the infidels” is not an empty slogan but the way to deal with all of their theocracy’s critics, starting with those who support such basic human rights as equality between the sexes.

This is not remotely the face of Islam in America. But there needs to be honesty about the appeal of this chilling worldview to many of the millions of Muslims in Europe, especially among young men who can’t find work and who are outraged by U.S. invasions of Islamic nations. A 2014 poll showed 27 percent of French residents aged 18-24 supported Islamic State, which analysts interpreted as reflecting vast support for IS among France’s young Muslims.

This is a foreboding picture of mass radicalization. However, there is one obvious way to begin to respond to the threat it represents, and that is — for the first time — to aggressively target those who pay the bills. “Donors in Saudi Arabia constitute the most significant source of funding to Sunni terrorist groups worldwide,” then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton wrote in a secret December 2009 memo revealed by WikiLeaks hackers. Wealthy Sunnis in Qatar, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates are also hugely helpful, U.S. officials have long confirmed off the record.

It’s time to go on the record. President Obama should lay out the facts about these terrorist enablers and then seek to shut them down. This may not reduce the number of jihadists and potential jihadists in Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. But it is a strategy that will reduce their resources and make days like Nov. 13 less likely going forward. And if this strategy damages U.S. alliances with the governments of Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates, so be it. These nations’ tolerance of their citizens funding Islamic terrorism suggests they are allies not worth having.”

 

 

Netanyahu existential threat for Iran: He wants war!

Dr. Parsi: “Nobody in the Obama administration believes that Netanyahu is trying to advance the chances of a nuclear deal. Fewer and fewer people in the US media believe that Netanyahu is doing anything but trying to push the United States and Iran towards war. In fact, AIPAC was instructing its citizen lobbyists to tell US lawmakers that war with Iran is preferable to the unacceptability of the status quo, i.e. Obama’s nuclear deal.

To understand Netanyahu’s message this week in Washington, one must understand that to those who crave war, peace is the existential threat.”  He wants war!

BBi7UEE (3)

Reality and Decision

what's real

 

 

 

 

 

 

This is a story of life in America, but it happens everywhere.  It is fictional and just an idea to make you think.  This is more about Syria and Iraq, two nations at risk of being divided into many pieces by forces founded by rich Saudi Arabian and Persian Gulf kingdoms, and some other nations.  Could the pieces governed by ISIS like rulers would create better democratic systems?  Make you think, does it not?

My meshuge is a mutt and no bigger than a ten-pound agitated and demanding coyote.  Anything moving makes him rattled and bark and bark.   He is my walking companion whenever the weather and my old joints permit strolling a short distance in our neighborhood.  He sniffs everything and drips on anything his leach would allow. His tail wagging and barking at the neighbors’ dogs as we walk through the street. 

I keep a watch on the neighborhood as though it is my business.  You think God gave me this responsibility.  But, it is not that.  We have had some problems, kids long delayed to grow up, break in to steal items to support their junks habits. These kids should get their testosterone level checked and should be in the Army so they could do their damages elsewhere.  Not in my street.

But, I tell you.  I have had some other kind of problems lately.  Most of my neighbors are old and do their own things and sometimes force a smile as we go by.  A house, just a few houses away from mine, is different.  I have to tell you about it, not that I would want your advice or giving me your own two-cent explanation. Gai in drerde.

The house is different.  I have seen two old couples as old as my granny in that house; bless my granny when she died just short of one-hundred a couple of years ago.  I have seen in that yard a young coupe with two kids, a girl short of 6 years old and a boy, not 4 yet.

From what I can see, they mind their own business and keep their yard clean and their old car washed.  But, there is something about that young boy.  The size of his feet and hands tell me he will be a big bruiser when he is matured.  It gives me a bit of problem when I think about it. Oy vay!

I am old and getting older each day. A few years from now, the boy will be strong and a tall, and I will be even older shorter than now.  When I was drafted to serve in the Army, I learned to fight and use the bayonet, handguns and you tell me.  I did my damage during the Vietnam War.  But, that was many years ago. A few years from now, how could I defend myself if the boy would then decide to walk over and maul me and some?  I am just thinking.  I am afraid of that boy, he may be four years old now, but he is growing boy.

I have been talking with people in my street and try to find the business of the boy’s family.  I was thinking if the family would face more hardship, then maybe they would sell or lose their house and move out of my neighborhood.  And that would be the end of my fear.

Anytime I go to the house, my mutt threatens to kill the kid, agitated and threatening.  My meshuge mutt is too small; otherwise, he could just do some serious damage to the boy. I am willing to sacrifice the mutt if he just could do the job. I have to face the reality and make a decision. 

I say it would be justified. Just ask, that is the standard of treating others, partially fear and mucked up with conjecture.  The boy would grow and could do some damage to me.  It is all for my safety.  I am justified.

But, could forcing the family out would create other more serious new problems?  The new owners could have more than one growing boy.  Then what?